Skip to main content
AA LocationAA Location
ListingsFor landlordsToolsBlog
Sign in
HomeBlogHow to avoid a bad tenant: a guide for property owners
PlacementMay 2, 20267 min read

How to avoid a bad tenant: a guide for property owners

A bad tenant means months of stress, costly proceedings, and sometimes thousands of dollars. Here's how to drastically reduce that risk before the lease signing.

Every owner who has been leasing for a few years has a bad-tenant story — late payments, unit damage, disturbed neighbours, or worse, months of TAL proceedings. These stories share one common point: they could have been avoided with rigorous verification upstream.

This article identifies the red flags to watch for, the critical verifications never to skip, and the classic judgment errors owners make under pressure.

Red flags to recognize

At first contact

  • Pressing request to visit without providing basic information
  • Refusal to share information about employment or income
  • Wanting to move in immediately without explaining the situation
  • Pressure to sign without a physical visit of the unit
  • Insistence on paying several months in advance (often a sign of upcoming difficulty, not a sign of solidity)

At file review

  • Incomplete documents or inconsistent paystubs
  • No prior-landlord references provided, or impossible to reach
  • Reference phone numbers that don't match any real person
  • Refusal to sign the credit-verification consent form
  • Very unstable employment history without credible explanation

At the meeting

  • Account of the current situation that shifts depending on the questions
  • Visible tension when references or credit come up
  • Requests for important modifications to the standard TAL lease
  • Insistence on paying in cash without a paper trail

A flag isn't a certainty

A single isolated flag isn't proof. But the accumulation of two or three flags on the same file deserves serious attention. Most 'bad tenants' showed at least two signals the owner chose to ignore in order to close quickly.

The verifications you never skip

Five verifications minimum, in this order, for any serious candidate:

  1. 1Credit verification (Equifax or TransUnion) with written consent
  2. 2Direct validation of at least one prior-landlord reference
  3. 3Employment validation through direct contact or official documents (last 3 paystubs)
  4. 4Search of the public TAL registry (rulings issued against the person)
  5. 5Identity validation (official ID, cross-referencing of information)

Skipping even one of these multiplies the risk. The total cost is low (usually $30 to $50 for credit verification, free for the rest), and the time required is measured in hours, not days.

Objective criteria: what really counts

Beyond the verifications, the overall analysis must rest on objective criteria. Here are the six that make the difference:

CriterionHow to evaluateTarget threshold
Payment capacityNet monthly income ÷ rentRatio ≥ 2.5 (ideally 3)
Employment stabilityLength at current employer≥ 12 months (otherwise credible justification)
Rental historyAverage tenancy at prior unit≥ 18 months
CreditCredit score + current debtsScore ≥ 650, no recent default
ReferencesAt least one validated positive referenceValidated via direct contact
File consistencyDo the pieces tell the same story?No major contradiction

No single threshold — a coherent whole

A candidate can have a 720 credit score but weak references — or income just at 2.3× rent but exceptional employment stability. The coherent whole is what matters, not any single criterion in isolation.

The most costly judgment errors

Choosing on personal impression

'He seemed honest,' 'she was nice' — these are the most common phrases after a leasing failure. Likeability isn't an objective criterion and can introduce unconscious bias (sometimes discriminatory). Decide on the file, not on emotion.

Skipping a verification to fill a vacancy

One month of lost rent is $1,200 to $2,500 depending on the unit. A bad tenant who doesn't pay for 3 months while waiting for the TAL hearing is $3,600 to $7,500 + proceedings + potential damages. The math is simple: an extra month of vacancy beats a bad signing.

Trusting an unvalidated reference

A phone number provided is never a reference — only once you've spoken to the person, verified their role as a prior landlord, and asked the right questions do you have a real reference.

Accepting a co-signer without verifying them too

A co-signer becomes jointly liable for payment — they must therefore provide a complete file, exactly like the primary tenant. An unverified co-signer brings no real protection.

The real cost of a bad tenant

To put it in perspective, here is the typical bill of a failed placement in Quebec:

ItemIndicative cost
Unpaid rent (3 to 6 months before judgment)$3,000 to $9,000
TAL procedural fees (service, hearing)$100 to $500
Bailiff fees for judgment enforcement$200 to $600
Unit damage beyond the deposit$500 to $5,000
Post-eviction vacancy (re-listing)1 month of rent minimum
Personal time invested (hearings, steps)Hard to quantify
Typical total$5,000 to $15,000+

Compare that total to the cost of a professional placement service — generally less than one month of rent. The cost-to-risk ratio speaks for itself.

AA Location

Reduce risk before signing

Our placement service includes rigorous file verification (credit, references, employment, TAL history) and a real-estate broker for lease signing. Free evaluation, no commitment.

Request my evaluation
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How should I react if a candidate insists on paying several months in advance?+

In Quebec, you can only require a limited deposit (first month's rent). An offer to pay several months in advance is often a red flag — it can mask difficulty providing standard verification documents. Maintain your normal process without giving in to pressure.

What recourse do I have if I discover the tenant lied to me after signing?+

If the false statement concerns an essential element (income, identity, situation), you can request lease termination from the TAL for misrepresentation. But it's a long, uncertain procedure — upstream prevention remains the best protection.

Does professional verification really reduce the risk?+

Drastically, yes — without bringing it to zero. No service can guarantee 100%, but a rigorous process (credit + references + employment + consistency) eliminates the majority of risky files, and one that passes all checks has statistically a very low probability of causing problems.

Read next

Related articles

Placement

How to find a good tenant in Montreal in 2026

A complete method to find a serious tenant in Montreal: what defines a 'good tenant', common pitfalls, mandatory verifications, and when to hand placement over to a specialized agency.

Read the article
Verification

How to screen a tenant legally in Quebec

Legal framework, written consent, accepted verifications, and mistakes to avoid: the complete guide to screening a tenant candidate in Quebec without legal risk.

Read the article
Rental market

Montreal property owner: lease alone or use an agency?

Hidden costs, real time invested, legal risks, and tenant quality: an honest comparison to decide whether to lease alone or hand placement over to an agency in Montreal.

Read the article

AA Location

Want to go further?

Request your free evaluation — a member of our team will contact you within 24 business hours to review your situation.

Free evaluation
AA Location

Rentals and property management in Montreal, Laval and Longueuil.

For owners

Find a tenantTenant selectionFile verificationLease signingRent out my condoRent out my duplexProperty management (optional)

For tenants

Tenant serviceAll listingsApartmentsCondosHouses

Our cities

MontrealLavalLongueuilPlacement by city

Tools

All toolsRent budgetMove-in costRental yieldRent price

Company

Free evaluationBlogAboutContact

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
© 2026 AA Location. All rights reserved.
3 Place Ville-Marie, Suite 400, Montréal, QC H3B 2E3
AA Location is a subsidiary of ADLI BEN TEKAYA INC.